find true love (read all 5 entries…)
Love, Life, Laconism 3 years ago

I’ve noticed a common trend with all the single girls I’ve been in contact with lately. All of them follow a pattern that I’ve been able to identify; whether it means I’m thinking too shallow or my choice of companion is lacking, I do not know.

After the initial answers in flirt to signal the start of an exchange of values, the girl retreats. Bang! They clam up into a shell, only responding to my pursue. I’ve seen enough of how bees & flowers gets realized in public to realize that a staggering proportion of males play out this game, blinded by the smell and sight of cookie kept just out of their reach.

My response to this type of girl is bound from deep within, asking, “Just who do you think you are, anyways?”

Maybe this is the reason why I can’t seem to make myself comfortable amongst women who I find any level of common interest with. The whole idea of love having so much back-breaking nonsense workload attached to the feeling of having someone to warm up your bed makes me ill from the inside. I’d write another commentary on how females act when I ignore them outright, but I may have to sit on that subject for a fortnight.

During the processing of this subject I realized the type of woman I’d be the most eager to fall in love with. I’d fall in love with a goddess who would become my muse. The one who enlightens my creativity, or mizzles into my undergrowth, or all that jazz. The one who makes me reach for the crazy, lunatic powers I’ve locked within. Whatever the looks or other characteristics of this woman are, I have no idea. The reason this person is a female come from the deeply bound teachings of modern civilization that are passed from one generation to another, not permitting any other choice in the face of a rejection of all that was correct and holy up until that point.

I am not happy with how things have turned out.



Comments:

I don't think you can make love a scientific equation...

Love is no a math problem that can be solved with calculus or trigonometry, sorry it’s not that easy.

Love is something you can not explain in one sitting, it’s unique for everyone, every couple experiences love differently, don;t treat it as something you can conquer because the whole idea is to fall for someone your attracted to, not someone who falls into your trap and you can control with psychology and lab experiments.

There’s something about a person’s free will that is exciting. YOu can not force someone into loving you. Oh you can learn everything about them, what they like and dislike, favorite colors, foods, clothing, sports, music, plays, dances, etc. However, those are just fondling and teases for the real relationship. If someone really loves you and you really love them, you will know it. Don’t be fooled into thinking anything less. When your heart soars above all else, when your willing to sacafice anything for her, willing to travel to fifty stores to find the perfect gift, or cook the perfect dinner not because you think it will cause her to fall in love with you, but your doing all these things because you really want to, you respect her, you don’t want her to get hurt and she’s worth everything to you, that’s love in your heart. Good luck with finding the right person for you to love.

(((((((((((((((((((huggs))))))))))))))

love,

George :)

The extremum

This is the sort of experience I’ve never felt in a strong way, so I can’t quite answer anything in it. I’ll have to look into this in the future. ^^;

(This comment was deleted.)
(This comment was deleted.)

(Pride and) Prejudice

Creating new relationships with people has its share of problems, seeing how humanity is what it is. Now that you mention it, I can imagine the female cynicism bound from the special attention near-constantly given to them by males who have nothing better to do.

The hang-ups, preconceptions, fallacies, they seem to me more like the crutches of social behavior used to simplify otherwise complex dialogue at even grounds – between two conscious human beings, and not the ‘macho man’ and the ‘damsel in distress.’

Interesting

I’ve never put any thought to the exact definitions of a Goddess or a Muse. When you put it like that, the shortcomings of my earlier approach become quite glaring… :)

calypte 2010: the year of PMA!

another thing

Women often thing men will see too many signs of interest as meaning they’re up for sex – right then. The pulling back can be a show of not looking too easy, or exposing themselves to accusations of leading a bloke on when they’re actually just being interested/friendly but not there yet.

The ultimate hang-up

Of course, sex is – as always – the darkest beast lurking in the shadows of our minds.

I’ve sometimes visioned of options to the general anti-eroticism consensus existing as a given just about everywhere around us. The two I finally accepted as feasible aren’t free of problems either…

First is to abolish all sexual intercourse. Only artificial pregnancies would be used. Successfully assuming this type of idea requires genetic manipulation of our inbuilt needs to reproduce, leading to endless unforeseen complications no doubt. If successful around the world (and not just the few richest countries), this could give real options to the overpopulation problems we’re facing.

Second is to let go of our hang-ups, bringing the odd tidbits of history from the ancient Greece back to life. Such a free sexual environment requires huge resources into developing general hygiene and medical knowledge, but if it means disassembling at least parts of the weapons industry as an answer, it’s not an impossible problem. I believe there’re even more mental stops to overcome with this approach than the first one, which I almost could see happening in the near future.

You see, this type of pondering leads me swiftly back to the original problem, where I can’t seem to be able to fall in love with anyone. ;)

Is it the overanalyzing?

Maybe I should move into a rural environment free from the pessimistic metropolitan mindset, where the mass of people and the endless disappointments in our fellow citizens have disheartened anyone who still believed in life.

(This comment was deleted.)

A rural environment

Obviously, this is not a rural-enough environment. ;) How about somewhere with no electricity, cars, and so on?

(This comment was deleted.)
(This comment was deleted.)

booksbooksbooks is still feeling very lucky

no sex?

you must be joking. i insist that you are. sex is not the dark beast. our socially derived and encouraged knowledge of and approach to sex is the problem. there is nothing wrong with sex. without it everyone would go bananas- it would disrupt everyone’s lives more than it does now. it would completely hinder human interraction and communication and it would be awful. if you have a country someday somewhere, i politely request to never live there.

you have read brave new world? 1984? feirenheit 451? taking away basic human behaviors and instincts and trying to distinguish them may sound helpful and logical in theory but i don’t beleive in it ever working to a positive end.

btw this wasn’t meant to be rude. just discussionary.

I’ve been in contact with 1984 and Fahrenheit 451, though I haven’t read either in the start-from-the-first-page-and-stop-after-the-last-one style.

As you can see from the solution following this Orwellian scenario, neither is not a belief set in stone for me – rather just how I’ve imagined our future might turn out, based on our sad actions through history. Ultimate control is the political fantasy that a lot of this world operates on.

Besides, we don’t have any real proof of any harmful effects, as we don’t have any proof of anything either way about gene manipulation. This is why I’m not willing to say it’s all rubbish either, as long as there isn’t any substantial, factual reason that stands before it.


dance like pasta sauce has gotten 3 cheers on this entry.

  • lynner cheered this 3 years ago
  • calypte cheered this 3 years ago

 

I want to:
43 Things Login