Wildcranberries will be staying for another year.
I’m supposed to stay off 43T until the Big Application is done, but I think if I do this during my lunch hour, it’s ok. I need to write a little in order to find out what I’m thinking.
I had a coaching meeting today, and I felt I was partly going around in circles, not being able to articulate and make clear to myself why I had such problems about making decisions about certain things (the two emails in my Action folder that have remained unanswered the longest, and then veering off to what I should do next year here and what I shouldn’t.) So, an attempt at understanding…
I have conflicting fears: That I’ll waste away this opportunity of working just on research for another year and a half – a very rare and much envied opportunity for academics. But, also, that I’ll waste opportunities that are offered to me here to teach and to tutor. Not only because of CV building, but because I’d like to reach people, to open students’ eyes to things I think are interesting, even to… influence the world a little bit. And to feel more a part of a community than I’ve been doing until now.
There’s a theory that we are here to live, love, learn and to leave a legacy. I think I’m being kind of proactive in the fields of living and loving. Although obviously life is not absolutely great in those areas right now, I know I am taking steps to create a life I want. But, learning and leaving a legacy… I don’t have children and it looks probable I might not ever have any of my own. Books I write and students and colleagues whose minds and lives I touch will be my legacy. And I want that legacy to be the best I can leave.
I know I have been doing less than great on the learning (and excelling) and the legacy-leaving since I stopped being a lecturer last summer. And, I’m trying to figure out… is life, for me, something that should be fully rounded and balanced every week, or every month? Or something where the balance is achieved through periods where one concentrates more on one or two aspects of it at a time, even if that’s at the expense of others?
The latter choice seems more humane, more merciful in some ways – there’s no need to be perfect in everything all the time. In these times, a life conposed of several different projects one after another seems like a norm rather than an anomaly. And yet, I’ve seen unhappiness and dissatisfaction and a sense of missing out on things to result from the serial foci strategy, whether it’s staying at home with a child for more than a year or two (not working on any other projects), or prioritizing career success over relationships and happiness. So, I really don’t know. Maybe the answer lies somewhere in different time perspectives. Neglecting important stuff for other important stuff is ok for a limited time. It must be, because life is organic and flowing. But, somewhere between six months and two years, maybe (I’m just trying to figure this out for myself), it is not ok to live only a partial life. What if I died tomorrow? What if I died in six months? What if I died in six years? All those perspectives on what I’d want my life to have looked like should be there all the time as I live my everyday, maybe.




