...propagate, in the context of this goal? I want to accelerate the evolution of the English language but I don’t necessarily believe that shorter words have to be the way to go. Are you saying that when we speak we should use the quickest, most succinct possible combinatin of words to convey one’s point?
To me, the evolution of our language should be worded towards proper enunciation and actual use of “root words”. A large vocabulary with flowing, illustrative words would be an example of a possible evolution of our langage, slang and shorthand speak could become extinct , but more slang and shorthand speak could be the other route taken. Is there a right or wrong way to accomplish this, or are we working against one another in pursuit of the same goal with different outcomes? I’ll be pondering…but will i be ignored for my “outdated” venacular?
does accelerate mean the same as...
3 years ago
Comments:
(This comment was deleted.)
yes, it is a big goal
I don’t see anything negative about your view, either. Just different than mine, which I find more intrigueing than infuriating.
I was only pointing out in my prior comment that while we may have the same goal, our intended outcomes are varied.
I too, like the thought of communication being more readily forthright, however, I think full expression may be cheapened by fewer and smaller words. It is only my opinion. No judgement on yours.
