Dear 43 Things Users,

10 years after introducing 43 Things to the world, we have decided we have met our last goal: completing the incredible experience that has been 43 Things. Please join us in giving one last cheer to all the folks who have shared their goals with the world, as well as all the people who have worked at The Robot Co-op to build this incredible website. We won a Webby Award, published a book, and brought happiness to a lot of people.

Starting today, 43 Things users can export their goals and entries from the site. Starting August 15, we will make the site “read only”. 43 Things users will still be able to view the site and export their content, but we won’t be taking any new content from users. We hope to leave the site up for folks to see and download their content until the end of the year. Ending on New Year’s Eve takes us full circle.

It has been a long ride (one of our original goals was to "build a company that lasts at least 2 years” - we beat that one!) While we wish the site could live on, it has suffered from a number of challenges - changes in how people use the site, the advertising industry, and how search engines view the site. We wish the outcome was different – but we’ve always been realistic about when our goals are met and when they aren't.

As of today, you will be able to download your goals and entries. See more about that on the FAQ page. Thanks for 10 great years of goal-setting and achieving.

- The Robots.

Export My Content
defeat the republicans (read all 133 entries…)
As a Democrat, I don't know whether to be relieved or horrified that someone like Herman Cain can jump to the top of the polls for the Republican nomination...

First, there is his 9-9-9 plan. Logically speaking, since lower income families use more of their income for purchases, in the end that means lower income families will actually have a higher tax rate than the rich. Just as an extreme example, if a family spends 100% of their income, then they will end up being taxed 18%. Let’s say a wealthy person only spends 10% of their income on purchases. They would only be taxed 9.9% of their income. This is the exact opposite of our current tax codes which utilize the logic that those with lower income need tax breaks and those with higher income can afford to help offset the tax breaks given to lower income.

From the analysis ABC News did, they found Cain’s plan would end up costing a family earning $50,000 an additional $2,725/year. How many families earning $50,000 year can afford to pay an extra $200 per month? The analysis did say that since corporations would be saving an average of $4,000 per employee and per Cain, corporations could pass that savings onto the employee… Riiiight, what world does Cain live in? ABC video is here.

Since his original plan also would tax food, something which most states exempt today, this would again be a bigger impact to lower income than higher income families. When it was brought up that most people would end up paying more under Cain’s plan, he “tweaked” his plan. I haven’t paid attention to the latest details.

Since Cain is the one who said about Occupy Wall Street: “Don’t blame Wall Street, don’t blame the big banks, if you don’t have a job and you’re not rich, blame yourself!”, it’s obvious he has no compassion for lower income people or those who are struggling in this economy.

And if he is going to make an analogy that his popularity is not “flavor of the week”, but Haagen Dazs black walnut… He ought to make sure the flavor he picks is not one which was discontinued by Haagen Dazs two years ago. (The video is available here.)

Secondly, a flat tax anyway will not cure our economic problems. We have a deficit. The only way a tax solution will help with the deficit is to increase taxes. Thus, his 9-9-9 plan only redistributes who is paying the tax, and it looks like the burden is being added to the lower and middle income families.

Finally, even though he is not a career politician, he sure acts like one. He stated that he was not aware of the financial “settlement” for the sexual harassment charges. Later, he admitted to knowing about the “agreement”, but not a “settlement”, saying “The difference between settlement and agreement, it makes a difference to me.” Then he initially stated he hoped that the amount paid did not come out to much, later saying equivalent of 3 months salary, then later 3-6 months salary, but one of the women received equivalent of one year’s salary. ABC covers the discrepancies here.

And his conflicting statements about an “electrified” fence also showed that it’s hard to understand what he is actually saying and what his actual views are.

For a humorous look at the electrified fence position, here’s Stephen Colbert’s view of the story:

And here is a summary from the Daily Show about Cain’s recent campaign efforts to downplay the sexual harassment controversies:

Click on the above images for the videos.

A more updated Daily Show story on Cain’s changing stories is at this link:



Todd Schoonover will miss all his 43T friends


I too am glad to see that Cain is at the top of the Republican polls over some of the other nut jobs that have been trying to earn the nomination. I can’t believe that this guy is trying too.


That is some strange Republican voodoo.

We have found in Canada, that giving corporations more tax breaks and a lower rate of taxation does not result in them hiring more people. It results in them getting higher obscene levels of profits! Reganomics “Trickle-Down” theory is a big loser. it just doesn’t work.
Our current federal government is very much like the Republicans in ideology and I can hardly wait for the general populace to get tired of them and vote them out in 4 years (I didn’t vote for them…).

As a strange anomaly to our voting system, only 61% of our potential electorate voted in our federal election last May 2nd and the popular vote was fractured among 4 parties. The so-called CONServative Party received 39% of the popular vote, so they were elected with a majority government (more than half the available Parliament seats) with only 24% of all potential legal-age voters voting for them! (i.e. 61% x 39% = 24%) ugh!

jimrin has gotten 14 cheers on this entry.


I want to:
43 Things Login