Not necessarily anything to do with procrastination, but I don’t really have a more appropriate goal for this.
Scott Adams, the guy behind Dilbert made an interesting post to his blog today about what he calls ‘Champagne Moments’:
I remember the day I got a call from United Media telling me they wanted to offer me a contract to be a syndicated cartoonist. Yay!
But hold the champagne, I thought…
And so the sequence goes on, to the point that he still hasn’t cracked open the champagne, because there’s always that next level to achieve. Now, obviously, I haven’t achieved the same level of success as Mr Adams, but it’s interesting (to me) to note the pattern.
Of course, the other aspect is the commitment:
I worked for ten years without a day off. During one particularly busy year, I held a full-time job at the phone company, wrote and drew Dilbert, and wrote a book called “The Dilbert Principle.” I didn’t sleep much that year.
You didn’t sleep much? No kidding!
I feel like I’m still looking for what it is that I do. I don’t feel drawn to anything in the way that Adams obviously was with his cartooning. I’m good at a bunch of things without necessarily being excellent at any of them. This seems like it might be a good thing, but it means I struggle to define what it is I actually do. I don’t even have a job description to guide me!
When I read my books, I can see connections, influences and gaps everywhere. Does that make me the world’s best reader? How do I impact the world via reading? I suppose it makes me a good example for reading and general curiosity! I feel like I have (at least) one book in me (who doesn’t?!), and I even have some ideas – but what are my credentials? Although I’ve had some successes, I don’t (feel like I) have done anything that gives rise to me credibly proposing a book on (for example) creativity, even though I may have lots of ideas around that.
I’ve heard that if you read for one hour a day on a topic for three years, you’ll be a world expert. That may be so, but would you read a book by someone whose only claim to expertise was that he’d read more about a given subject than anyone else?

