Pi & The English Alphabet by Marty Leeds
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TyjD2IWgD-A
pre-conclusion (post-analysis): “no causal relationships”
- “THE HOLY NUMBER 7” ?
- 7 days of the week (two are of the “weekend”)
- 7 deadly sins (just in Catholicism?)
- 7 days of creation (one was “rest”) [see also “7 days of the week”]
- 7 notes of the major scale (not set in stone; in China it is 5)
- 7 colors of the rainbow (actually this is probably literally an infinite number!)
- 7 chakras (in “so and so” system)
I don’t think the word “word” comes from the Greek word “logos.” Sure, it may have a weak similarity, but I don’t think our word “word” has any “animating principle pervading all things”! My dictionary says it’s from Old English, akin to “verb.”
Alpha & Omega? Z does not = Omega.
“Pi begotten by 7”?! What’s that mean? No explanation given?
How does pi begotten by 7 & pi begotten by 7 give me 26??!
Why is heaven a 3 and earth a 4? This is merely theory.
So 9 & 8 are very close – who cares? You say “it’s close,” but someone else may say it’s “not close enough”.
What makes “8 squared” squared besides calling it “sQuAr’d” and drawing it inside a square box? That’s just showing evidence of forethought about how they’re going to direct language usage.
Son = Sun? In how many languages?
So you have to be “annointed” into 33-degreed Masonry because Jesus was “annointed” at 33? So the Masons copied & pasted all this stuff into their own system?
universe = “one” “line of poetry”? My dictionary says “verse” comes from “vertere” – to turn.
Why should I care about Jacuin & Boaz??
“Jesus”? – of-course – no mention of why they translated the name “Jeshua” into “Gee-Zeus” (oops – cat’s out of the bag now)!!
And what is all this math pointing to? What big revelation – other than the numbers in pi can be a convenient place to hang your hat or your alphabet, or your tale. This is nothing more than a demonstration [demon-stray-shun] that one can use math in combination with the directing &/or use of various words, phrases, names, shapes of capital-letters [M-A-N]{note that his “A” had no cross-bar}, & other cultural baggage {religio-political kon-trol}. Conclusion: “no causal relationships there-in!” Weak at best, sir. (I wonder if that’s why you don’t allow responses to the video.)
Edit: I forgot to mention that there were a couple of interesting points he made, but I can’t remember exactly what they were right now. So I may re-watch it some day.
.