3 people want to do this.

end the war on drugs.


 

People doing this:

  • Washington State
    3 entries
  • Washington State

  • Entries

    Former police chief advocates legal drugs 2 years ago

    Former Seattle Police Chief Norm Stamper advocated the decriminalization of drugs in a speech before a packed audience Wednesday in Arntzen Hall 4.

    Western sociology professor Ron Helms, who said he organized the event to expose the community to a controversial viewpoint, introduced Stamper to the audience.

    “When I see opportunities to bring people in who can offer insight and thereby stimulate public discourse on policy, I jump in,” Helms said.

    The reasoning for decriminalizing drugs, Stamper said, comes from the largely ineffective war on drugs the Nixon administration started in 1971.

    In an excerpt from his new book, published in May and titled “Breaking Rank: A Top Cop’s Expose on the Dark Side of American Policing,” he said American taxpayers are financing the war on drugs at a price of more than $50 billion per year. So far this year, taxpayers spent $59 billion on the drug war; with more than $1 trillion spent since the 1970s, to no avail, he said.

    Near the end of his speech, he added that the government’s anti-drug movement has placed all of the drug industry’s power squarely in the hands of organized-crime leaders.

    The illegal drug market thrives on government drug prohibition because it can exploit customers by charging far more for an illegal substance than it cost to acquire.

    Should the government legalize drugs, it could tax distributors similar to the way it does with liquor stores, Stamper said. This would create less price exploitation, he said.

    Stamper said he wanted laws to regulate the age people could purchase or possess the drugs, similar to the alcohol laws police already enforce.

    “Anything that moves us toward a saner path is OK by me,” he said.

    Stamper said the United States only prohibited the world’s most dangerous intoxicant, alcohol, for a short time in the 1920s.

    “Alcohol is hands down the one drug that police officers and anyone else with eyes and mind open will acknowledge is the most damaging drug of all,” he said. “It costs more in money, health costs, personal losses to individuals and their families than all other drugs combined.”

    Stamper went on to recount an incident in which, as a 21-year-old recruit training to become a member of the San Diego Police Department, he was sitting with his colleagues in a local doughnut shop and heard a thunderous car crash nearby.

    A drunk driver slammed a Lincoln Continental into a tree. The impact propelled the woman sitting in the passenger’s seat into the windshield before sending her flying into the backseat.

    “What I remember more than anything else is the smell of the booze because it just reeked,” he said.

    Although Stamper calls for the legalization and regulation of all drugs, he believes certain professionals should be drug-free in all circumstances.

    Examples he gave included police officers, airline pilots, firefighters, soldiers or any other professionals whose job could put lives at stake if they performed under the influence.

    Stamper also advocated the legalization of prostitution.

    “It’s long since past time to legalize and regulate the behavior in both the sex industry and drug scenes,” Stamper said.

    On the subject of prostitution, Stamper said the U.S. government needs to make it a legitimate business and move it into brothels, as Canada did. This would make the practice safer, as prostitutes would no longer need to face dangers such as murder while walking the streets.

    Western senior Erica Rasmussen said she was surprised to hear Stamper’s ideas in his speech.

    “I’ve never heard a police officer say ‘we need to legalize drugs,’ ” she said. “I mean, he had a valuable point in that if it was legalized, it would be regulated. But it was just surprising to hear that firsthand.”



    10 Steps to End the War on Drugs. 3 years ago

    While the main purpose of DrugSense is to encourage accuracy and
    honesty in the media with respect to illegal drugs, our goal is
    ultimately to stop the costly and ineffective drug war. Through our
    extensive archive of more than 170,000 articles on all aspects of drug
    policy, we have identified 10 specific steps that would result in
    ending prohibition as we know it.

    1. Grant agronomist Lyle Craker a license to grow medicinal-grade
    cannabis at the University of Massachusetts.
    http://www.mapinc.org/people/Lyle+Craker

    Effect: End the federal government’s monopoly on growing marijuana to
    meet the FDA’s requirement for an independent, high quality
    cannabis supply for approved cannabis-based research and product
    development.

    2. Pass the Hinchey-Rohrbacher Amendment.
    http://www.mapinc.org/people/Hinchey

    Effect: End the costly DEA harassment of California dispensaries and
    allow states in which medical cannabis is legal to begin regulated
    access without federal interference.

    3. Accept the Petition to Reschedule Cannabis.
    http://mapinc.org/find?165

    Effect: Remove cannabis from the restrictive Schedule I designation of
    the Controlled Substances Act (CSA) and permit its prescription by
    physicians like pharmaceuticals.

    4. Make Afghani opium available to pharmaceutical companies.
    http://www.mapinc.org/areas/Afghanistan

    Effect: Develop a licensing system so that opium grown in Afghanistan
    can be legally sold to make narcotic pain relievers, thereby
    alleviating a worldwide shortage of these medications.

    5. Defund the National Youth Anti-Drug Media Campaign.
    http://www.mapinc.org/campaign.htm

    Effect: Save taxpayers hundreds of millions by eliminating this
    campaign, which has only resulted in making drug use more attractive to
    teens.

    6. Increase funding for needle exchange and safe consumption sites.
    http://www.mapinc.org/find?142

    Effect: Prevent overdoses, reduce drug-related hospital admissions, and
    slow the spread of HIV/AIDS and hepatitis C.

    7. Eliminate Mandatory Minimum Sentencing.
    http://www.mapinc.org/find?199

    Effect: Reduce the non-violent prison population, and end the racial
    disparity in sentencing that has resulted in one in three black men
    between the ages of 20 and 29 being under correctional control.

    8. Free non-violent drug prisoners and stop the Federal trials of Marc
    Emery and Ed Rosenthal.
    http://www.mapinc.org/people/Marc+Emery
    http://www.mapinc.org/people/Ed+Rosenthal

    Effect: Save the taxpayers the wasted time and expense spent trying
    these non-violent individuals on unpopular charges.

    9. Develop citizen oversight boards for SWAT squads.
    http://www.mapinc.org/raids.htm

    Effect: Save lives and property that are needlessly disrupted through
    the use of a violent techniques for non-violent situations, which are
    too often drug raids based on bad information.

    10. Pass as many lowest-priority marijuana initiatives as possible.
    http://www.mapinc.org/props.htm

    Effect: Help the government understand that citizens want to be
    protected from violent terrorists, not non-violent marijuana
    consumers. Public officials, including police, need to prioritize
    their scarce dollars and resources according to that which is most
    dangerous and most urgent to public health and safety.

    Of course, we at DrugSense know that many more steps need be taken to
    move away from drug policies based on fear, prejudice, and
    misinformation, and toward policies grounded in science, reason, and
    compassion. If you have an idea or step that could be added to this
    list, please post it to
    http://www.drugsense.org/nuke/Forums&file=viewtopic&p=2654

    While you are at it, please make a contribution to help fund the hard
    work that makes such a list possible. http://www.drugsense.org/donate/
    DrugSense is a 501©(3) educational non-profit; your donation is tax
    deductible to the extent provided by law.

    You may also mail a check or money order to:

    14252 Culver Drive #328
    Irvine, CA 92604-0326

    Do not forget about our matching funds grant! Every dollar you donate
    will be matched by a generous funder. Your contribution will have
    twice the value! http://www.drugsense.org/donate/

    Help change drug policy now! You can begin by pushing for these 10
    steps and by donating to DrugSense to promote more sensible policies.

    Mark Greer
    Executive Director, DrugSense
    MGreer@mapinc.org

    DrugSense is working to encourage accuracy, honesty, and common sense
    in matters involving the failed, expensive, and destructive “War on
    Drugs.”



    How Prohibition Affects Crime, Law Enforcement and the Press 3 years ago

    If demand for a banned product persists after a prohibition is enacted, a criminal market is created automatically. If the banned item is difficult to produce, hide, and use-say a nuclear weapon- the prohibition may well be successful (at least for a while). On the other hand, if there is strong demand, and the product is easy to produce and smuggle, the criminal market will quickly expand to satisfy that demand. Owners in the criminal market are awarded a lucrative tax-free monopoly on their products. The value of this monopoly is further enhanced because the prohibitory legislation is a modern alchemy; it adds to the value of theretofore cheaply produced, mundane products.
    While criminal markets remain subject to basic economic laws, they also operate under unique conditions which produce important differences from the way legal markets function. Among them is a strong incentive for secrecy; they can’t be studied with the standard tools economists use on other markets; thus no economic data from criminal markets can be meaningfully compared to those available for every other product in our society.

    Another important difference: criminal markets have no peaceful means for resolving the inevitable disputes over territory and access which plague every market and which are normally resolved by courts or regulators. Shaky agreements with other criminals or uneasy truces punctuated by violence, become their modus operandi. To the extent the markets become lucrative, they have the potential for extreme violence.
    A corollary of the monopoly awarded to criminals for production and sale of banned products is the companion monopoly awarded to law enforcement, who become the only agents empowered to deal with them. They alone can legally buy their products, trap and apprehend vendors and consumers, and interdict shipments. This has created two highly undesirable situations: the most obvious is the well understood inducement to corruption that comes from unmonitored contact between poorly paid policemen and enormously rich criminals.

    A second and less well appreciated consequence of the police monopoly on interaction with illegal drug markets is their virtual monopoly on information that flows from it. There is no way ordinary citizens can observe a criminal market other than by becoming its customers, transporters, or vendors. The press itself has limited access; occasional interviews with users or retail workers, most of whom have good reason to avoid such interviews- or remain anonymous when they do grant them.

    The record shows that police agencies have learned to make good use of this information monopoly; they are almost always the primary source of any news story about drug enforcement, trends in drug use, new smuggling techniques, etc.. Major drug stories tend to be written from a sensational standpoint – either outlining a new “menace,” providing interesting details on the latest wrinkle in interdiction, or titillating with an account of the effects of new agents. As such, they both provide free advertising for illegal drugs and tend to document the need for an ever-expanding police effort.

    Prohibition was undone largely because law enforcement’s ability to suppress the illegal alcohol market was overwhelmed so quickly that there was no political will to fund a matching expansion of police resources. In contrast, drug prohibition as policy has become prisoner to the fact that the enforcement effort has expanded just slowly enough to be tolerable while reaching its present grotesque size, the very dimensions of which now guarantee a larger, more vociferous, well connected, and respected police chorus pleading for more money each year.

    Thus, to the extent the press has become willing victims of the police information monopoly on illegal drug markets, they have facilitated growth of the futile police effort to “control” those markets. Even at this late date, they tend to applaud the latest “smashing” of a drug ring with little recognition that new actors wait in the wings and the market will continue to prosper. It has only been in the past few years that a spate of opinion pieces, most written by independent columnists, have begun to look realistically at the inevitable perennial failure of law enforcement. The best summation of this travesty is Dan Baum’s terse phrase: “The politics of failure,” as a subtitle of his book, “Smoke and Mirrors.

    The Internet has emerged as an alternative mechanism for balancing the police/press monopoly on information about illegal drug markets. Although the primary news source in most instances continues to be a law enforcement disclosure to the working press, the Internet allows access to many different reports and interpretations of the same phenomenon. News archives with a capacity for rapid retrieval allow current claims to be compared with earlier reports; most importantly, alternative evaluations of policy are enabled and informed challenges of standard newspaper accounts are facilitated.

    The past three years have seen an undeniable erosion of the press support previously expressed for drug prohibition. This has been accompanied by a string of successful medical marijuana initiatives, which- if California is any harbinger- will bring many new instances of police intransigence before the public. Whether this ferment will be enough to change policy anytime soon remains to be seen, but it is a necessary prelude to the defeat of at least a few pro-drug prohibition politicians which remains the sine qua non for radical policy change.
    In the meantime, an enhanced understanding of the basis for the unplanned, but effective, Police/Press collusion on drug policy issues should help counteract its effects.

    Tom O’Connell




     

    I want to:
    43 Things Login