My Congress man (Dave Reichert) appears to think that he can obsfuscate his position on Network Neutrality… I thought you folks would like to see how our representitives try to portray their positions…
Thank you for sharing your thoughts and concerns regarding telecommunications regulations. I appreciate the opportunity to respond.
As you may know, on June 8, 2006, the House approved H.R.5252, the Communications Opportunity, Promotion, and Enhancement (COPE) Act by a bipartisan vote of 321 – 101. I supported this bill because it allows consumers more choice and competition to television and the Internet and also encourages investment in next generation broadband networks. H.R.5252 will reduce regulatory barriers allowing local telephone companies to enter and compete with the cable television market. The COPE Act promotes needed competition in video, bringing more choices, lower prices, and better services to consumers.
I find this an interesting perspective to offer. He says he’s supporting choice and competition by allowing the Cable/Telecom companies un control monopoly positions. (Since, there is a duopoly of control in the delivery of broadband connections to people’s homes in the US. You can choose the phone company or the Cable company… That’s not competition when you give them the right to control who has access and who does not.) Further, this will cause a direct increase in your cost to use the internet and to buy items from the internet. As charges passed to the content providers simply gets passed along to consumers.
During consideration of the COPE Act, there was an open debate on “net neutrality”. Net neutrality is the term used to describe the concept of keeping the Internet open to all lawful content, application and services. There has been increasing concern that owners of local broadband connections (cable or telephone companies) may block or discriminate against certain Internet users and/or sites and give advantage to their own services and/or Internet sites.
You may be interested to know I supported an amendment to the COPE Act offered by Congressman Ed Markey (D-MA) that would add stronger net neutrality language to ensure the preservation of the Internet as a free market, preventing any discriminatory nature of the Internet. This amendment would have ensured that consumers continue to access any lawful Internet site, content, services and applications without the interference from network operators. Unfortunately, the Markey amendment failed by a vote of 152 – 269. The COPE Act has been referred to the Senate and no further action has taken place at this time.
Interesting… I do note that he supported the amendment… but apparently not with enough conviction to actually stand up and vote against a Cope act without Neutrality Protections. Seems to me he needed an out to “look like a nice guy on the subject”.
Please be assured I understand your concerns about the COPE Act. As Congress continues to consider telecommunications legislation, I will maintain my support for the continued growth of the Internet as an open, non-discriminatory platform for communication and innovation. I do not believe in blocking, degrading or impairing consumer access to the Internet and its content.
Really
Some how I’m just not getting that he understands my concerns… Seems to me if he understood… he would have voted against the bill!!!!
I appreciate hearing from you. Please do not hesitate to contact me with any other concerns or questions. It is important to note, due to heightened security procedures resulting from Anthrax and Ricin incidents, mail to my U.S. Capitol office is significantly delayed. I encourage you to contact me via my website at http://www.house.gov/reichert/ to expedite your thoughts and I apologize for any inconvenience.
Already done… I’ve posted my concerns to his website and email. He doesn’t get it… I’m going to work to help him understand…