I was able to get my hands on four candidates for next semester’s book today. I have to pick one as soon as possible, which means narrowing them down and then reading the one I think is the best option and seeing how it goes.
One good option is Outcasts United, suggested by Colleen_ C _C. Immediately in the first few pages, I see a good selection of sentence structures and verb tenses. The level of vocabulary and storytelling seems about right. It is kind of journalistic in tone, but I think the story will be engaging, and soccer is a topic that many people are interested in. Additionally, it addresses the refugee experience, which some (but not all) of my students are living, and I think the personal stories will be engaging enough, even if they don’t like soccer. I may have students from some of the same countries as the students in the book, and they might feel interested to see their country featured and excited to see a book about what it’s like to be a refugee in America. I hope they don’t find the book too similar to their experience in the sense that they don’t get anything new from it. I don’t think so, but I wonder if it challenges them enough to make connections. It deals with some difficult but relevant topics, and it could bring up some bad memories. I think if approached with sensitivity it could be OK. I will need to read it to know more.
The Cellist of Sarajevo was suggested on a book list I found online. It is, of course, about war – so it could be relevant to my students, and could also bring up some bad memories. I’m worried about how graphic the war descriptions are. I know that the other books suggested by the Chair have some graphic violent images in them, and I’m less worried about war violence than about sexual violence, as I’ve explained. It seems advantageous in some ways that it is not about a culture any of my students are likely to be from, and yet addresses aspects of their experience. The range of grammar seems good, though a bit literary (therefore difficult) at times. The vocabulary seems difficult in some parts. Overall, it may simply be too challenging for my students.
West of Kabul, East of New York was on the same book list. It’s interesting in that the author explores his relationship to two worlds: Afghanistan, and America. I would say the key audience is Americans, though, and one purpose of the book seems to be explaining Afghanistan to Americans. I’m not sure if my students would relate, and there is a big section explaining about Islam. I’m not sure how that would go over with my many Christian students who fled persecution in a Muslim country… I have already been accused this semester of being prejudiced against Christians… That’s probably not relevant, but I’m just not sure my students are the target audience for this book anyway… Linguistically speaking, it does have a useful range of structures. The vocabulary level varies. It doesn’t seem as “teachable” as Outcasts United though.
Reading Lolita in Tehran, also suggested by Colleen_ C _C, seems provocative, probably in a good way, but I wonder if the many references to various works of literature scattered throughout the text would pose a teaching challenge. The subtleties of the language might also pose a problem. I think the combination of high-level vocabulary with literary references makes it too difficult for this class to read on their own in a semester, considering the limited class time we can devote to supporting their learning.
Having “talked” this out here, I think I’ll start reading Outcasts United more thoroughly and see what I think. There are tons of teacher resources on the website too. 12 months ago