In class yesterday we did an exercise designed to see what we characteristics of personhood that we, as a group, value. Here’s the task:
Imagine that there is a large ship that is rapidly sinking at sea. There is an island with a small human city and a great deal of forest which can be reached by lifeboat. However, there is just one lifeboat left, and you must decide on which order you would place the following creatures on the lifeboat:
_1) an intelligent, healthy, morally virtuous human
2) an intelligent, healthy, morally corrupt human
3) a healthy moose (there is an indigenous moose population on the island)
4) a collie with a permanently lame leg
5) a severely mentally disabled human
6) ten chickens
7) a breeding pair of an endangered species of bird, once native to the island
8) a human in a coma who will almost certainly never come out
9) a breeding pair of commin, but beautiful, indigenous songbirds
10) two breeding pairs of a non-indigenous variety of rapidly breeding wild rabbits (with no known predators on the island, and an extensive food supply)_
My ranking went like this:
1) human in coma
2) disabled human
3) morally virtuous human
4) morally corrupt human
5) collie
6) moose
7) endangered birds
8) songbirds
9) chickens
10) rabbits
Now, would you believe that in a class of 13, I was the ONLY ONE who put the coma guy first?
People, where is your COMPASSION? And they accuse me of being cold! One guy even had the nerve to suggest using the coma guy as a flotation device for the others! Argh!
Here was my logic:
If you were to dump everyone in the water at once, who would have absolutely no chance of survival? The coma guy. He goes in first. Second goes in the disabled person, by the same reasoning. The healthy humans go in next. The collie goes ahead of the moose because I happen to like collies, and though I’m no authority on the subject, I assume that dogs have a higher capacity to feel pain and suffering than do moose. The endangered birds go next; if I’m going to save something, it might as well be something that needs saving, no? The songbirds come before the chickens because they are already native to the island, and the chickens come before the rabbits because it is dangerous to introduce new species to an area, especially one that has no natural predators there.
I thought this was, for the most part, pretty sound logic. The rest of the class, I noticed, tended to think in purely utilitarian terms, i.e., the morally upright human is of the most value to society, so he goes in first, etc.
Anyway, I was shocked and horrified at some of the responses (one guy put the dog above the disabled human, which prompted much protest from the rest of the class), and I hope that I’m never in a situation where one of them is deciding my fate on a lifeboat.