and become a man of contrasts — 2 years ago
Thank you Lotte for exposing my existentialism, you are quite right by describing my situation as being Kierkegaardian.
By living my indecision I could be accused of compounding my contrasts, if this is good or bad, time will tell. As the great man said “Life can only be understood backwards; but it must be lived forwards”.
Either I believe that the best decision is to make no decision or I am still playing with my Schrodinger and I have made both decisions simultaneously with out committing to either decision.
I think it can be said that I have made a quantum decision and being a “Knight of Faith” I must live with the consequences believing I have made the right decision logically therefor both suppositions in the paragraph above are true. Knowing this makes me feel better as I am no longer wracked by self doubt.
The superposition I have placed myself in leads others to believe I am a man of contrasts, while in fact I am a man in turmoil conflict. (Some 43’ers don’t think I am a real man at all and that I am digitally personified).
My persona actually lends itself to existentialism, normally I am a “Knight of Faith” I do make decisions, I believe in free will, in being different. My individuality is important to me as is having the freedom not to have to make a choice hence my dilemma.
Quotation #26993 from Michael Moncur’s (Cynical) Quotations:
Most men pursue pleasure with such breathless haste that they hurry past it.


